| "HOPE IS NEVER FALSE." -- Barack Obama |
Is this the kind of thing some of you are talking about when you worry that Barack Obama isn't a politician, he's a Sun Myung Moon-like cult figure? (Which is ironic, considering how many Republican candidates have, in fact, been backed by Reverend Sun Myung Moon, his Unification Church that practically defines a cult, and his cult-owned newspaper.) Is this what makes you see people waving their fists in the air and chanting "Yes We Can!" and instead of seeing happy, cheering people, you see Hitler's Nuremberg Rallies? The end of his victory speech in St. Paul last Tuesday night:
"America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love. The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment - this was the time - when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America."
Or, as Chris Muir parodied it:
But it really loses something, both the emotional impact for his supporters and the fear it engenders in his opponents, without his ringing tone and the cheering, crying, screaming mass of tens of thousands of fans, with another ten thousand and more outside wishing they could get in:
Is that what you're afraid of? Is that what scares you so much?
Then you've forgotten your own history. Because what I thought when I was listening to that speech, at least what the analytical part of my mind was thinking and saying was, "That man's been studying his Reagan." Specifically, three words: "Morning in America," quite possibly the best damn political speech of the entire 20th century. Because Ronald Reagan, and his speech writers, knew that trying to make the conservative case to America in 1979 and 1980 was an uphill battle. Nobody trusted the Republicans, not just because they'd screwed up the country so badly in the past (that was over a generation before, who was thinking about that?) but because conservatives had a reputation, already by 1979, of being nothing but haters. Bitter, angry, hate-filled harridans and mugwumps, viciously foaming at the mouth about everything that was wrong with America. And it wasn't an unfair characterization, nor is it one still: almost without much exception, nearly every conservative hates America, even still, even after so many years of conservative rule, for not living up to their post-WWII "Return to Normalcy," "Father Knows Best" fantasy of America. And you know what? The American people (quite rightly) fear and despise and loathe haters.
But Ronald Reagan had a very unique biography, for a conservative. For decades, he'd been a moderate-liberal anti-communist labor leader, and a washed-up 3rd rate character actor. Then his second wife converted him to conservative Republicanism, and through her family connections, General Electric hired him to go out and give anti-communist speeches ... and something nobody expected, something magical, happened. Ronald Reagan fell in love with his live audiences. And through them, he fell in deeply, rapturously, sensuously, palpably in love with America, and for it, America, even so many Americans who knew better, loved him back. And from then on, it came through in everything he said; he could say the most hateful or spiteful or stupid things, but you knew, you just knew from the sound of him the sight of him, that even though he meant every word, he still loved America, he still loved Americans, and he still believed in America. Hence, the single most reliable applause line of so many Reagan speeches: "There is nothing wrong with America! that cannot be fixed! by what is right with America!"
And so it is with Barack Obama. His bizarre family story and unusual upbringing sheltered him from so much of the things that turned other men and women of his generation, myself included, so bitter and cynical. And through the power of his religious faith, the man has truly fallen just as deeply in love with the American people as Reagan did -- and even more than Reagan did, he's done so without losing his mind, without losing his skills. The generation after mine, the Millennial generation, finally old enough to vote in large numbers, are lapping this stuff up; it's what they've been raised from birth to look forward to, to hope for, to believe in. If the Republicans had even one candidate with Obama's defining features, his love of the words "us" and "we," the humility (real or faked) with which he entrusts himself to his young campaign staffers, his ringing call to band together and make the world a better place than the ideologues and the cynics have made it (again, a generational call to the Millennials, the DARE generation, who've grown up hearing that just this was their eventual mission), and above all, that bright, shining love for America that is all over his face every day? Then we'd be the ones who were in big trouble.
When Obama speaks, it's not for nothing that you see people in their 30s and 40s openly weeping. I know how much that scares you, how cultish and freakish and messianic religious it looks to you, but you've misread it. What you're seeing is the generation that Strauss and Howe called "Generation Thirteen," the groups that advertisers and demographers called Gen X and Gen Y, the people born between 1960 and 1980 or so, whose life experience as the most Aborted, Retried, Ignored, and Failed of all American generations has made us almost entirely bitter and cynical to a man and to a woman, of every race ... being dared to hope. Being dared to believe that the fascist nightmare of post-9/11 America is temporary, being dared to believe that we are not going down together inevitably to the darkness, being dared to believe that Karl Rove's bitter and vicious "50%+1 vote" divide and conquer strategy for keeping all Americans angry and at each others' throats can and will end. And I know what those crying people at the Obama speeches are crying about, because sometimes, I cry too, for the same reason I cried a little in my seat at the end of Avenue Q when people and muppets of my own generation tried to reassure me that just like the good things in life, everything disappointing or scary in life, including George Bush, is also only "For Now."
We cry because we're not like the leading-edge Boomers who rushed to embrace Reagan's similar promises that the stagflation and rampant crime and racial rioting of the 1970s were not an inevitable slide into oblivion for America. (Little-known fact: ex-hippies gave Reagan his single largest generational majority.) Boomers are idealists. Boomers want nothing more dearly than to be told that all that's necessary to change the world is to find the right ideas and cling to them no matter how much evidence piles up. (And don't think for a second that the next generation after you doesn't blame you for that sickness of the mind.) So when Reagan appealed to your idealism, when he begged for you to hope and to believe again, it wasn't terrifying to you, it was affirming. You could reassure yourself that it wasn't your idealist mindset that was the problem, only that you'd been trumpeting the wrong ideals. But when Obama offers us hope, offers it to those of us who lived through the wreckage of the "consciousness revolution" and then the "Moral Majority" and the "Campus Crusades," and then Reaganomics' union-busting and deliberately engineered high unemployment that exactly coincided with our generation's graduation from college? And when Obama makes us, by the sheer force of his own belief he makes us want to believe in the same "promise of America" that he believes in, the same American Dream? Damn right we cry. We cry, "You, you, you motherfrakker. You had better not be lying to us. You had better not make a wise old bitter cynic like me believe when I know better. If you're going to tell me that everything I've felt and everything I've believed my entire life was a lie and make me believe it, you had better the hell be the one of us that's right." Asking us to dare to hope that George Bush hasn't wrecked America permanently, it hurts.
But that's not a cult. That's a national transformation. Don't fear it as a cult. Although, if you are a Baby Boomer conservative, especially if you're a fundamentalist Republican or a conservative "Democrat for the Leisure Class"? You can fear it as maybe the end of your day. Because with the Millennial Generation's hope and sunny optimism and generational bent towards teamwork, and our generation's savvy rules-lawyering and our wary eyes watching out for them, and a few Boomers who've found something new to believe in watching over them? We're going to try our damnedest to bring an end to the nastiness, the American-on-American hatred that has been your generation's legacy for the last almost 50 years. And with a man who loves America and who believes in America and who truly loves the American people as our standard bearer? That's not a cult. That's change, baby, change you better believe in. Because it's going to happen, whether you believe it now, or not. Not believing that the American people are going to fall in love with Obama isn't going to do you any more good than not believing the American people could be stupid enough to fall for Ronald Reagan did me back in 1980, so you might as well start getting used to it now.
- Mood:
hopeful


Comments
I heard the 'big speech,' after the brouhaha about Rev Wright first came out. It was the first time I'd willingly sat through a repeat of a political speech. It was the first time I sat, transfixed, listening to one. It was the first time I wept for joy when I heard a political speech.
Yes, it sounds cultish and freakish... but, dammit, it's hope. Something we haven't had for a very long time, and it breaks my heart to hear it again.
There are a few LJ's I've read that have been smug about dismissing Obama as an elitist, an intellectual, an inexperienced pup, all sorts of things. I really just makes me wonder what these people have against hope. Why do they fear it? Why do they shun it? Honestly, these are people who aren't much better off than I am, and yet they're strong supporters of Bush, or cynics, or bitter, or something. Why are they so quick to dismiss hope?
Sometimes, you don't need an economic plan vetted by a hundred financiers and economists. Sometimes, you don't need a national strategy penned by a dozen ex-military. Sometimes, you don't need a health plan put together by insurance companies and health care specialists. Sometimes you just need hope.
They look around in confusion knowing they cannot hear the music the rest of us hear. Then they deny it exists, since they can't hear it.
but it's there, all the same. I hope it's enough.
That's from the inaugural address of William Jefferson Clinton.
I (a 13er) had most of my class (Millennials) out for testing one day late this last semester, and for some reason the kids decided to ask about politics (I'm a math teacher). While we started out comparing policy between the (then) three major candidates, by about 10 minutes in I was laying out Strauss and Howe's entire generational theory as a way of explaining what the dynamic between them was, and then it went from there. One of the kids said, as she left, that she felt like she'd learned more about American politics in that one day then in the last six weeks of her US Government class.
"And through the power of his religious faith"
He's an atheist. That's why he is so damn good. He "gets it" all without delusion, without poppycock, without yakking away to an Invisible Cloud Buddy. He was raised an atheist and he joined a church because, I believe, Michelle's parents would have never let her marry if they didn't do so. Plus, in the world of community organizing, all events take place at the church. It is more than religion, it is a meeting place, a social event where ideas are shared and plans made.
This guy has his head on straight. He sees all the change that needs to be made and he just stands up, with intelligence and courage and says, "We will change things." He knows what needs to be changed, the only cult he is in is rare intelligence tempered by common sense. He can, however, never acknowledge atheism in a theist country.
And it pleases me to know that I wasn't the only one who teared up at the end of Avenue Q when they sang, "For Now". ;)
Ironically, that same evening at White Fence Farms, near Jolliet, IL, (which is run by relatives of Dennis Hastert, btw) I saw the following on someone's bumper....
Which, if you look around, is pretty much true. Even the few die-hard Bushies that are left can't deny it.
If Obama gives us some hope after that, I am all for it. Cult of personality? Maybe. But it is time.
Edited at 2008-06-09 09:26 am (UTC)
Obama is just another politician, you and others attribute greatness to him simply because he echoes what you want to hear. Although he is better than most at that, it's still just a facade as yet. Reading transcripts of his speeches is an eyeopener. He offers very little tangible to get exited about.
[shrug]
National Transformation doesn't frighten me, empty quasi-religious fervor generated by a sort of new age messiah does.
BTW, and as an aside: It'll come as no surprise, but I believe that the liberal/left/progressive end of the spectrum are, and have been, those who hate America. Saul Alinsky and others have defined the methodology, Obama has experience implementing that method.
Moving on.
Have you picked up Rick Perlstein's Nixonland yet? It seems like it would be right up your alley.
I'm willing to bet this dubiousness isn't just a Boomer thing, and I'm not sure whether it's a more or less reasonable mistrust or a really chilling level of cynicism.
By the Gods, I hope to live in a country with him as its President. He probably won't fix most of our problems and the fixes he does make probably won't be visible until after he's done. But starting down the right path is more than enough reason to hope and dream. . .
but frankly i've had enough of cynicism and hard-eyed calculating. i'll take some idealism, please, with a little optimism.
khairete
suz
Sapphire Energy claims to make crude oil out of their patented green slime algae + CO2 + sunlight. It's on the Climate Debate page off Arts & Letters. Probably a stretch, probably just methane so far.
I myself, with just a few cheap burritoes. . .
Actually, Obama reminds me of RFK rather a lot. Of course that could be because I'm reading "The Last Campaign" by Thurston Clarke just now.
It's been a long time since we had a politician who seems to inspire so many people. Even longer since we had a progressive candidate who did so.
Hope is such a precious commodity and it's been so hard to come by over the last, bleak and awful seven years.
While many of my own views might be more lefty, I am conservative in some ways as well. But I've always stuck to the idea that I'd rather vote for a person than for a party. I go with my instincts, and Obama has been the first candidate I've seen in a long time that clicks with what I think so many of us want to have in a President. We want someone we can look up to, but doesn't look down on us. We want someone who is intelligent and educated, but also wants to hear ideas from others and is willing to really *listen*. Moreover, I think we want and really *need* a President that we can be proud to send out as our ambassador to the world. Someone who can be held up as an example of what The American Dream really is, and no matter how humble one's beginnings, you can achieve amazing things that were never thought possible.
As to the concept of liberals/conservatives hating America, I'll say this. I think that the biggest difference is conservatives want to bring back the nostalgic America they remember, liberals look to the future and what they think America can become. While I am a history buff, and enjoy thinking on how simple some things were in the past, the best use of history could be seen as a way on how to make our future better. Things won't go back to those simple times and will get more complicated. It's all part of our evolution as a species ......and expecting it to do the opposite is like asking a human being to convert back to being a single-celled organism.
Edited at 2008-06-09 06:36 pm (UTC)
Some of us are weeping because we see people getting sucked in by yet another status quo politician making promises of change that can only realistically happen if there's a mass revolutionary struggle to change things at a systemic level. Obama is a Pied Piper using promises of change to preserve the current system, no matter what surface reforms are made.
I don't disagree that Obama offers hope, and change. I like Obama, but I say that with huge reservations about whether or not he is right for the country, as a leader. I have yet to hear a single word from him about how and what things will change. Certainly he's provided us with ideas, but I really don't want to be mandated to purchase government provided/overseen services.
That isn't to say that McCain is better or that Hillary would be better. Frankly, I don't think any of the candidates are the right match. I don't believe the solution to our problems lies in a Republican or in a Democrat. I don't believe that either of these two organizations can provide what is needed in the United States at this time, and what is sorely needed (aside from hope) is a glimmer of Integrity, a sense of Responsibility, and the Will necessary for an overhaul of our infrastructures (political, economic, and social).
I don't think we'll find that in either of these parties. They are too concerned with their own well existence to care about the people they want to govern; too concerned with getting their share of the pie, indeed with their piece even, that they forget the whole. So many hands and fingers, there's not enough left to address the needs of the nation as a whole. Until we work through this fascination with political parties, with these two parties...it won't really matter, and change won't really occur.
But with him proving so eager to throw women and LGBT people under the bus during the primary, I'm left to wonder, hope for whom?
The McClurkin bit still rankles with a lot of people. (Myself included.)
Those tears are not the reason I support him. I liked him before they came - because of Iraq, because he really seemed to have his head screwed on straighter than the other two. I'd be worried, about myself, if I really had been drawn along by tears - but I think that those who cry 'cult!' and act like all of his supporters are just mindlessly following the charisma are merely refusing to look at the real policy beneath it because they don't want to examine why people vote for that policy.
1: too ignorant to know you're right,
2: a brainwashed drone devoid of sufficient capacity for independent thought to understand that you're right, or
3: a being of PURE EVIL who actually KNOWS that you're right, but disagrees purely out of a desire to do harm.
Fnord.
Edited at 2008-06-09 08:56 pm (UTC)
I find it strange when people I have known for years, who are firm athiests and who have said over and over again that they think being a religious person should disqualifiy a person from holding office - now cry and volunteer for Obama. I'm seeing them embrace this in the same manner as a religious conversion. They don't talk about what he will *do* if her wins the office...they talk about how he makes them *feel*.
I'm not saying all or even most Obama supporters are like that. I'm not saying it's bad to feel hope or be excited about a candidate. But damn...people...get a grip.
You put a lot of faith in believing that Obama is worthy of your accolades, that he loves America, and all that rhetoric; but this could just as easily be indicative of a successful marketing campaign, calculated specifically to resonate with specific markets - e.g., 'Gen 13', the Boomers, idealists, liberals, students, the disenchanted, etc. He's playing to the crowd, so it's not shocking when they get swept up in emotional fervor. It's what you'd expect from a well-polished marketing scheme.
If Obama really loved America, he wouldn't be promising war without end in Iraq and Afghanistan, while taunting Pakistan and Iran. If he really loved America, he wouldn't be in the pocket of the nuclear industry. If he really loved America, he wouldn't be pushing FTAs. If he really loved America, he wouldn't be whoring himself - and America - to Zionists. If he really loved America, he wouldn't be in bed with Big Pharma.
Among other generalized characteristics, cultists unquestioningly follow their charismatic leader, in spite of contradictory evidence. They actively ignore all challenges to their prejudices. That's certainly happening in Obama's campaign.
I'd be a fool to suggest there were no qualitative difference between McCain, Clinton or Obama, but in the end, they all serve the same master, and it ain't America.