And then there are days when, right at the deadline to get started on this column, somebody comes along and actually proves to me that what I'm doing is worth doing. The payday loan industry seems to think that I'm important enough to try to sneak-attack me. For something that I did more than a year ago, no less.
On November 11th of 2005, I wrote a journal entry entitled, "For Me, the Face of Terror Wears a Business Suit." A significant chunk of that journal entry related to a theme that I've dealt with more than once in this journal, and that is that thanks to state of the art lobbying and lazy legislators who didn't think about what they were agreeing to, we have taken some of the Mafia's most reprehensible scams and handed them over to perfectly legal corporations who, perfectly legally, make them even more destructive and monstrous than the original scams were. No Mafia numbers racket ever did anywhere near as much damage to this country as any of the big casino firms has done lately, and no Mafia loan-sharking and leg-breaking racket ever did even a tiny fraction of the damage to this country that payday loans and other predatory lenders have done. Not least of which because the Mafia knew that what they were doing was wrong; these increasingly psychopathic inhumans feel entirely smugly justified in laying waste to whole neighborhoods at a time.
Only now they're running scared, because an increasingly awake Congress, even before the Democratic takeover, has already fired the first big shot across the payday loan scam bow. Your average soldier or sailor, being working class, is just as vulnerable as any other working class person to the baited bear trap that is rollover payday lending. But when they screwed over America's fighting men and women during wartime, even their traditional Republican allies were brought face to face with the human wreckage that resulted, because thousands of people that the Republicans were depending on to die for nothing in the Middle East were suddenly unable to complete their service; at best losing security clearances they needed because of debt, and at worst committing any crime up to and including murder/suicide because of what the payday lenders had done to them and their families. So Congress outlawed payday lending on anything resembling the terms the industry has become accustomed to if the borrower is an active duty member of the military. Bad enough, that, but now the cold winter wind is whistling through the trees and the voice on the wind says, "Why only them?"
Which, I guess, makes it worth it for the payday loan megacorporations to hire consulting firms to Google up every blog entry on every blog that actually correctly and successfully analyzes what's so evil about what they do, and try to subvert it. 13 months after the original post was written, I only just tonight got the following tacked onto the comments to the above journal entry (condensed for space):
That's so embarrassingly transparent that it says something sad and pathetic about the American workforce that whoever created that account and pasted in that reply felt justified in billing their client for such shoddy work. As I said in my reply, not that whoever wrote that is ever likely to come back and check their replies, How fucking stupid do you think we are?
On November 11th of 2005, I wrote a journal entry entitled, "For Me, the Face of Terror Wears a Business Suit." A significant chunk of that journal entry related to a theme that I've dealt with more than once in this journal, and that is that thanks to state of the art lobbying and lazy legislators who didn't think about what they were agreeing to, we have taken some of the Mafia's most reprehensible scams and handed them over to perfectly legal corporations who, perfectly legally, make them even more destructive and monstrous than the original scams were. No Mafia numbers racket ever did anywhere near as much damage to this country as any of the big casino firms has done lately, and no Mafia loan-sharking and leg-breaking racket ever did even a tiny fraction of the damage to this country that payday loans and other predatory lenders have done. Not least of which because the Mafia knew that what they were doing was wrong; these increasingly psychopathic inhumans feel entirely smugly justified in laying waste to whole neighborhoods at a time.
Only now they're running scared, because an increasingly awake Congress, even before the Democratic takeover, has already fired the first big shot across the payday loan scam bow. Your average soldier or sailor, being working class, is just as vulnerable as any other working class person to the baited bear trap that is rollover payday lending. But when they screwed over America's fighting men and women during wartime, even their traditional Republican allies were brought face to face with the human wreckage that resulted, because thousands of people that the Republicans were depending on to die for nothing in the Middle East were suddenly unable to complete their service; at best losing security clearances they needed because of debt, and at worst committing any crime up to and including murder/suicide because of what the payday lenders had done to them and their families. So Congress outlawed payday lending on anything resembling the terms the industry has become accustomed to if the borrower is an active duty member of the military. Bad enough, that, but now the cold winter wind is whistling through the trees and the voice on the wind says, "Why only them?"
Which, I guess, makes it worth it for the payday loan megacorporations to hire consulting firms to Google up every blog entry on every blog that actually correctly and successfully analyzes what's so evil about what they do, and try to subvert it. 13 months after the original post was written, I only just tonight got the following tacked onto the comments to the above journal entry (condensed for space):
User:Hmm. And what a coincidence that the post recites every single one of the industry's advertising slogans and political talking points, and also just so happens to include a helpful link to one of the malevolent examples. Fake blogger? Easy enough to check. In fact, too easy. Journal is of one of the free types, created the day before the comment, with no interests that would suggest that she'd ever find my journal, not from my home town so there's no reason to think somebody told her about it in person, has never written an entry before, has not friended anybody, and the profile is almost entirely blank.starla8
Date: 2006-12-30 01:30 (local)
Subject: (no subject)
Hi, you have a very interesting post here. ¶ I agree with what you said “We have legalized whole industries in this country that do nothing more than destroy human lives for profit - - tobacco industry, the casino industry, pay day loans, title loans, sub-par mortgage lenders.”
However, on insurance companies and payday loan lenders, I think they are here to help. Insurance acts like a forced savings that when an emergency comes, you can get money from it. ¶ Because most of us do not have a sufficient emergency fund in the bank, most do not even have an emergency fund at all - so like in my case, I often turn on getting a payday loan. ¶ To me, it is fast cash to cover a financial emergency. I have used it to pay for my son’s medication, to pay my due credit card bill which would otherwise apply a late fee charge that would cost more, pay an expensive car repair and even pay my utility bills. ¶ So far, it has worked out for me because I always pay it in full and I only get an amount that I only need as well as an amount that I can afford to pay. ¶ As they said, these industries are here because people patronize them and people need them and in the first place, they were conceived because people behind these industries felt that need.
That's so embarrassingly transparent that it says something sad and pathetic about the American workforce that whoever created that account and pasted in that reply felt justified in billing their client for such shoddy work. As I said in my reply, not that whoever wrote that is ever likely to come back and check their replies, How fucking stupid do you think we are?
- Mood:
good - Music:jocopro's video to Jonathan Coulton, "Code Monkey," over and


Comments
If you think the comment is honest, you might at least want to reproduce it without a working link so that the link-spammer doesn't benefit. YOu probably can't edit the comment, but you could delete it and reproduce it without the link being a working one. You may wish to edit your post to make the link non-working too.
If you think the spammer isn't really interested in conversation and just wants to get his/her link posted to more pages, you can also report the account as an abuser. Especially if the account is used to post to other journals or communities with the same text and link.
Seems to be a lot of link spam lately. Usually if I click on "most recent posts" and skim 50 or so posts, I can find one with random text and carefully-created links mixed in. This is not quite that, but still, don't let the spammer benefit by boosting his search rating.
Here is something you might know the answer to: What should we do if we see an entire journal that is nothing but spam, and what will LJ do on finding them? Usually if I skim the 50 latest posts, I will see 2-3 posts in spam journals.
They are not posting in communities or other user's entries, just happily plugging away in their free account, consuming resources I paid for and providing link spam for google to index. Here are some samples:
http://alexandria-step.livejournal.com/
http://tampa-dion.livejournal.com/
There's not a slick automated way to report these like with comment spam. I'm just wondering if it's worth it to report them as abusers...
If you encounter such a journal in your daily ramblings, though, and it's obviously a spambot trying to game the recent post feed or similar, you can report them as abusers through the standard form since there isn't a better way of doing it. I won't guarantee that it'll get removed - it's pretty much a case-by-case thing.
Two days after my unit got back from OIF1, I badly wanted to go out drinking. I didn't have nearly enough cash on hand for the bender I planned, and my ATM card had expired while I was over in Iraq. So, I walked into one of those dens of stupidity, figuring that I had the money in my account, so they couldn't screw me over too badly. Ha! They wanted to charge me 20 bucks for a 200 dollar check. So I chose to charge my drinking binge to my newly-paid-off credit card instead. Better the devil you know...
I got my very first cellphone text message spam yesterday. Wanna guess who it was from? If you guessed 'payday loan company', you would be right. If they call me again, I am going to sic our new Attorney General (whom I know personally) on their unwary butts.
Every time I see one of those misleading, patronizing commercials, I want to throw a shoe at the TV.
TV folks are the best at covering "live breaking news". Like the fire down the road, the weather, or a traffic jam. "The World in 15 Minutes".
If you want depth, you used to be able to go read a paper, but now that the papers are all 75% ads, they write Cliff Notes.
And radio, well all it is good for is either background noise, listening to some one who will tell you what you want to hear, or my prefered use, pissing me off (2am in the morning, 5 hours left to drive, tune in Rush and the Ditto Nation and be angry). I think I get as much info out of most "Harry, Dick 'n' Tammy" morning shows as I ever got out of most talk radio shows.
And all of them have to attract to as big of an audience as possible.
Brad has 500 readers, and could get by with having 1.
They can not afford to piss off their readers.
Brad most likely thinks he is failing if he doesn't manage to piss off someone every once in a while.
They have deadlines, size limits, and editors.
Brad can work on something when he wants, spend 6 months making it just right, make it the size he wants, and is his own editor.
Seems to me that the odds are all on the Blog Journalist side.
It is also why I use traditional media for my 30 second updates, and bloggers for my in depth look at a subject.
Ask again in 5 years when papers are all online, anyone can submit an article, and the writers get paid by how many page views they have for that article. TV reporting will get replaced with a YouTube/Metacafe type format. But radio will still be for entertainment and background noise.
Bloggers have the time to do the in-depth not well known stories that put a lot of hard issues in perspective. Kudos to Brad and the rest of the unknown bloggers out there.
I read non-fiction books about different current events and Mother Jones Magazine. That's it. I don't watch any live TV. If there's a show that looks interesting I add it to my NetFlix queue or buy the DVD.
I've found I'm much happier, and if something truly big happens it gets posted by one of my Live Journal friends. I never signed the contract that states I have to subject myself to the constant stream of cacophonous and verbally violent noise that is our mass media.
I just hope my fellow American citizens realize they don't have to swallow the toxic sludge and do as I have done. Personally I would like to see 90% of the media outlets in this country consigned to the dustbin of American media.
Apparently, around this time last year some of them were having enough fun with "fees" that they were effectively charging five-digit interest rates to some people.
I'm not surprised that your LJ gets some notice from people-- it's well written, hits on many topics, never boring to read. I'm sure you have more than just the 450 readers or whatever.
Maybe one of these days we'll see a link to one of your articles on the Huffpo.
And then we compound the error with places like payday loan sharks.