?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Cost of Preaching Jesus' Gospel: $3,000,000

Probably the single best and most important thing I've ever written in this journal was a series of essays entitled "Christians in the Hand of an Angry God." (If you haven't read it yet, please, do.) In it, I made the argument that in an attempt to persuade people to vote Republican (for anti-communist reasons), the churches have been knowingly and explicitly teaching a false gospel, a gospel that has more in common with the teachings of the Temple of Set than anything in the Christian Bible. And when I wrapped that up, the leading question I got was, "What should I do about it?" And I had to explain to my readers that neither guys like me who aren't Christian, nor Christians who hold the Bible in low regard, can do anything useful about it. The only people with any credibility to confront the preachers of Satan's gospel are those who revere the actual teachings of Christ and the rest of the Christian scriptures, which are more than adequate to the task of refuting the Republican pseudo-gospel, the one that says that the Great Commandment is, "Thou shalt vote Republican."

Well, other than my insight into how this false gospel was sold to the current generation of evangelical Christians (for which, see the articles), I wasn't the only one who noticed. It turns out that seven months before I wrote "Christians in the Hand of an Angry God," Minnesota megachurch pastor and published theologian Gregory Boyd was preaching the same thing, more or less. His series of sermons, entitled "The Cross and the Sword," came about because all through the early part of 2004 people in his church were taking it for granted that since he was an evangelical Christian, preaching from the pulpit of a huge suburban megachurch to a middle class and upper middle class congregation, that he obviously had to be 100% in support of Republican candidates and the whole "Christian Right" social agenda. From this Sunday's article about it in the NYT: "The requests came from church members and visitors alike: Would he please announce a rally against gay marriage during services? Would he introduce a politician from the pulpit? Could members set up a table in the lobby promoting their anti-abortion work? Would the church distribute “voters’ guides” that all but endorsed Republican candidates? And with the country at war, please couldn’t the church hang an American flag in the sanctuary? ¶ After refusing each time, Mr. Boyd finally became fed up, he said."

So he preached a series of six weekly sermons whose point was that no, it is not a commandment from God that you vote Republican. No, matters of sexual morality, in particular other people's sexual morality, are not central to Jesus' message. No, God does not call you to sit in judgment over others. And in particular, no, it is not God's will that Christians take over the government qua Christians and run it according to Christian principles, that theocracy is not God's will for America and that around the world, theocracy has been a bad idea for Christians. So, if this happened in April and May of 2004, why is it in the news? Because Boyd just released those sermons in book form, as The Myth of a Christian Nation, and is doing the book tour for it. And one of the things he said in the interview he did for the NYT struck me as really, really interesting.

Those of you who aren't from the USA probably don't have the first clue what megachurches are, or (the relevant point to this) how they work. A megachurch is a single church building the size of a Walmart Supercenter or a small shopping mall. It's built around an auditorium with a better sound and light system than most Broadway shows or major rock concerts, that can comfortably seat 4,000 people or more -- and does so not just on Easter and Christmas, but week after week. To support 2000 families' needs, and in particular 2000 families who are used to receiving a certain level of professional service from everything else in their life, takes big money. But with megachurches mostly being located in or near prosperous "edge city" exurbs, it turns out to not be a problem funding, oh, for example, a food pantry that's bigger than most inner-city grocery stores, or a Sunday School bigger and better equipped than most suburban schools. And as it happens, when Boyd preached "The Cross and the Sword," the church was in the middle of a fund raising drive that was forecast, based on past experience, to bring in an additional $7,000,000.00 to fund normal operations. But by the end of the sixth sermon, 20% of the congregation -- and in particular, apparently the wealthier and more supportive members -- had quit in anger at the pastor for preaching something other than the Republican gospel. And they took with them the $3,000,000.00 in pledges they had been expecting to make. So now we know, in at least one case, what it costs to preach that George Bush isn't God's prophet on Earth, Jesus doesn't say it's OK to hate the poor, and that wealthy people don't usually have all of that money because God recognizes their virtues: $500,000.00 per sermon.

Comments

( 21 comments — Leave a comment )
dslartoo
Jul. 30th, 2006 06:40 am (UTC)
Now that man is the kind of Christian I can live side-by-side with and have not a single problem. I applaud him for speaking his views despite his congregation's narrowmindedness.

cheers,
Phil
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:32 pm (UTC)
Not his entire congregation's narrowmindedness, notice. 4000 of his 5000 members stayed. Only the wealthiest 1000 left.
ithildae
Jul. 30th, 2006 06:58 am (UTC)
With all due respect, Brad, I don't believe that these mega churches represent most Christians any more than the Temple of Set represents most pagans.

With my particular sect of Christianity, it is easy to have a direct influence on what is taught. We have a lay ministry. While a good more than half tend to vote republican, our sect comfortably holds the Senate Minority Leader of the USA. He is not a republican. We are asked to vote for candidates of good character and conscience. (One of the many reasons I don't like King George.) The mega church model does not represent me.
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:37 pm (UTC)
I'm about 2/3 of the way through Kevin Phillips' American Theocracy, and I'm afraid he lays out some pretty compelling statistics to show that you're sadly wrong about this. The two particular denominations that preach the most Satanic fake gospel are the Southern Baptists and the Assemblies of God, and between them and people who don't self-identify with any denomination but who agree in very large part with the doctrines they preach, they do in fact make up the clear majority of the Christians in America, and a near majority of the overall electorate. Note in particular that for the last 10 or 15 years, it's been the Southern Baptists, the larger and faster growing of those two, that's been the most aggressive about purging any denominational officials or pastors who still preach the same gospel that Jesus preached.
ithildae
Jul. 30th, 2006 09:46 pm (UTC)
I thought that Catholicism was the largest Christian sect in the USA, by a wide margin. If the Southern Baptists are such staunch supporters of republican values, why aren't more blacks voting republican?

I am not disputing that there is some stupidity going on among Christians, I dispute that it is most Christians. And I again claim that the population served by these mega churches is not representative of most of Christianity, even if they do have most of the money.
(Anonymous)
Jul. 30th, 2006 01:56 pm (UTC)
It's unfortunate that so many Americans are using blind allegiance to what is written in the Bible---a book that has been changed, rechanged, and rewritten again and again (see Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus"---as an excuse for not using their minds and their consciences. And even then many of the people in those megachurches Sunday after Sunday are ignorant about much of what is written in their Bibles. Quick to condemn everyone else's sexual lives, but cautious to remember Jesus from Matthew 25:45, "I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it for one of the least of these, ye did it for me."
Great series Brad; great comment today. Cheers for Pastor Boyd.

Zo



sunfell
Jul. 30th, 2006 02:16 pm (UTC)
I read that article last night, and listened to "The Cross and the Sword".

I do not normally listen to sermons, but this one was really good, once he made it to the main point. It was clear that he actually studied history- particularly European history under the rule of the Church, and drew the same conclusions as I did- it's a bad idea all around.

Not being Christian, I practice a 'power-within' life rather than a 'power-under' life as he preaches, but that was really the only difference I had with what he talked about.

I thought that there was some great hidden irony buried in the article: that American Christianity is not about Jesus and his teachings at all. Judging by the reactions of the wealthiest and most hard nosed walking out, and taking their tithes with them, American Christianity is about money and power-over.

Hell, I could have told you that. The Hypochristians use Jesus as bait to get more money and power. They are the very Pharisees that Jesus condemned, all pompous in their 'whited sepulchres', but full of corruption and dead bones.

That original essay of yours was really good. I think that one of my mods has crossposted it to dark_christian. It deserves a revival.

:-)
doodlesthegreat
Jul. 30th, 2006 02:27 pm (UTC)
I've been saying for 20 years that the Christian Right is the Pharisees recreated. If there was a second coming, clownboats like that would be the first ones running to Home Depot for lumber and nails to build crosses out of to send the guy right back.
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:28 pm (UTC)
Well, I've suspected for a very long time that no adult goes to church in order to be told what's right and what's wrong. They go to church to be reassured that they're right. And that applies equally well to all religions, not just Christianity.
drgndancer
Jul. 30th, 2006 03:25 pm (UTC)
A small suggestion to help readability on on your "Chrisitians in the Hands of an Angry God" series. Part 3 and part 4 have some private posts in between, and they screw up your "next post" links from the Live Journal side for people who aren't your "friends". I had to go into the archive and find the next valid post. Maybe hard links at the end of each part to the next part (if you have time)? This may be the only place the problem exists, but I haven't finished yet so I don't know.
wyldraven
Jul. 30th, 2006 03:41 pm (UTC)
I was just about to make that very suggestion. I didn't even know there was a part 4 or 5 until I stumbled across them today.

Brad, I have posted direct links to each part in my journal, and indicated them as an essential read. Thanks again.
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:12 pm (UTC)
I think there was just the one, and I locked it last night.
galbinus_caeli
Jul. 31st, 2006 01:30 pm (UTC)
I think you got it. The articles are now in order. There are several days between part three and part four though. A click fo r next part would help readablity for newbies though.
(Deleted comment)
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:22 pm (UTC)
ionotter
Jul. 30th, 2006 05:55 pm (UTC)
Aloha, Brad!

I've got a few of these types in my home town, and I'd love to present your "Christians in the Hands of an Angry God" to them, but they seem to think that the Internet is a kind of web made by spiders that live on highways.

May I please have permission to compile those posts in a dead-tree format, with a bibliography so they and anyone else who reads it can follow the links themselves?
bradhicks
Jul. 30th, 2006 07:25 pm (UTC)
As long it includes the phrase "Copyright 2004, J. Brad Hicks. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, NonCommercial, ShareAlike 2.5 License," and don't charge money for it (that's the NonCommercial clause in the contract linked in the left column), you may do anything you want with it. That's the point of the Creative Commons copyright blanket license.
ionotter
Jul. 30th, 2006 11:16 pm (UTC)
Excellent!

Despite the terms of the Creative Commons Clause, I'll still generate the article and submit the finished product to you for review as a courtesy.

ethesis
Aug. 6th, 2006 03:18 pm (UTC)
Send me a copy too, or let me know when you publish it so I can buy one.

I've linked to the cost thread from my blog (which I suspect would enthuse no one here, so no link from me in the post).

Just saying thanks, and interested in copies.

ionotter
Aug. 7th, 2006 03:26 am (UTC)
Just awaiting the word from Brad right now. And it's not going to be sold. If anything, it'll be published in PDF format for the internet, and any hard copies will be made at my own cost.
adnara
Jul. 31st, 2006 03:35 am (UTC)
I love you and this wonderful wonderful man.
gerrard28
Nov. 29th, 2010 11:24 pm (UTC)
That's what happens when religion and politics mix together. It's not supposed to be like that. I won't change the view on my religion though, people are the ones to blame for this, my faith will remain the same. I never heard of this kind of fees at Church of Shambhala, I wonder why's that...
( 21 comments — Leave a comment )