The first principle of Biblical fundamentalism is that "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." (2 Timothy 3:16-17) In other words, every word of the Scripture in its original language is 100% precisely the word that God Himself intended to be there. The Holy Scripture is the primary and only 100% reliable means by which God communicates with mankind. This is not a ridiculous thing to believe. I believed it once, from early 1976 through mid 1983. Biblical literalists believe that when God has chosen to amend His word, He has ratified that change by a time of miracles. In between those times, He has miraculously intervened to protect His word, so that those who didn't live in times of divinely inspired prophetic writers could also receive His word ... and be judged thereby. It may seem odd to you to believe that God subtly intervened over thousands of years of time, moving men's hearts in subtle ways, actingly only and continuously to protect the integrity of one collection of books. If it does seem odd to you, then I can only assume that you (like me) do not believe it, and assure you that whatever it is that you do believe, it looks just as silly to someone else.
Nonetheless, this belief is sincerely held by somewhere around 45% of the American population, so let us take it seriously for a moment. Like a lot of ex-Christians, I know a lot of Scripture. I made a serious, dedicated study of it, at schools dedicated to the teaching of it. I narrowly escaped a career in the Christian ministry. I am so sure that I know what I am talking about that I am willing to debate anyone who says other than I do about what the Scripture actually says and what it doesn't actually say. And here is what I say that it says: The gospel that is being taught in almost every evangelical and fundamentalist church in America is a false gospel, and it has condemned tens of millions of people to eternal damnation in the fires of Hell.
And what's worse, I am not the only one who knows this. Many of the pastors who preach this false gospel know it to be false. They went to academically rigorous seminaries. In those seminaries they studied God's word as I did. They were then carefully told what they could and couldn't say to their congregations if they wanted to hold a job in the ministry. In so doing, they were told certain passages to gloss over, to skip as much as possible, to obfuscate and misdirect whenever they came up. Instead, they were told which verses to emphasize, which explanations to give. Those who stray from their denominations' line on these matters find themselves unemployed; the false churches that fill this land don't want to hear the true gospel. In rare places around the country, some churches do cling to ministers who proudly call themselves Biblical literalists and who, nonetheless, preach the true gospel of Jesus Christ, not the false gospel of the majority of the fundamentalist churches. But when those leaders and those they save from the fires of Hell seek leadership posts in the major fundamentalist denominations, such as the Assemblies of God or (especially) the Southern Baptists, they find themselves ruthlessly and totally purged. Jimmy Swaggart knew this. He was preaching about it from time to time, before the prostitution scandal conveniently brought him down. He used to say on a regular basis that "Satan is very good at twisting the Church into a position of being directly opposed to God." And Satan, and his satanic ministers in almost every evangelical pulpit in America, will not easily let go of what those who would be God's people hear. Donald Miller has written several books about his search to find the true gospel inside so-called gospel churches; those so-called gospel churches condemn him and won't let him speak to their so-called faithful, and so his words go mostly unheard.
What is the false gospel? The false gospel is summed up in Campus Crusade for Christ's "Four Spiritual Laws," four laws that appear nowhere in the Bible itself: "Law 1: God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. Law 2: Man is sinful and separated from God, therefore he cannot know and experience God's love and plan for his life. Law 3: Jesus Christ is God's only provision for man's sin. Through Him you can know and experience God's love and plan for your life. Law 4: We must individually receive Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord; then we can know and experience God's love and plan for our lives." To this end, they provide this "suggested prayer" as the magical ritual that will absolve you of all sins and guarantee you an eternal life of Heaven, not Hell: "Lord Jesus, I need you. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord. Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life. Take control of the throne of my life. Make me the kind of person You want me to be." They and those like them preach that this is all that you need to do in order to guarantee that your name is written into the Book of Life, the list of those who will go to heaven on Judgement Day. Hundreds of millions of people all around the world believe this right now. Hundreds of millions more of them have believed it since it began to be preached in this way about 45 years ago. Many tens of millions have died believing that by performing this little ritual, they have saved their souls from damnation. A very large percentage of those who did so will find themselves burning in Hell for all eternity, and completely baffled as to why. Why? Because they were lied to.
You see, Judgement Day is described in three places in the Bible. In the false churches of the false gospel, they teach and preach extensively on one of them, 1st Corinthians chapter 15. They talk about Revelations chapter 20, but they don't quote it completely or accurately. But there's a third place where Judgement Day is described, and in rather more detail than in either of those places. What's more, it's described by the one who's going to do the judging. Wouldn't you think that that would be the interesting place to study Judgement Day? I'd certainly be more interested in the explicit, complete description of how the dead shall be judged that comes from the Judge Himself than one that came from any apostle, however inspired. And indeed, they can't completely make this description go away. But they have a false and fatuous explanation of it, one that encourages people to forget what they just read and go back to believing that lie about how all they had to do was pray, "God have mercy on me, a sinner." Here's what Jesus had to say, in His own words, in Matthew 25:31-46, when His followers asked him what the end was going to be like:
(Next: How did so many seminaries and so many preachers and so many authors get converted to this false gospel? What deal did they make with Satan himself, and why? What did they think that they were doing? These aren't rhetorical questions. I've met one of the people who "signed" that deal and helped enforce it. He was quite proud of his achievement, and years later told many of us about the meeting where that decision was made. It is only recently that I came to understand just who the other side in that deal really was, as opposed to who the fundamentalists in that room thought they were dealing with. But this is already too long for one day. Tune in tomorrow.)
Nonetheless, this belief is sincerely held by somewhere around 45% of the American population, so let us take it seriously for a moment. Like a lot of ex-Christians, I know a lot of Scripture. I made a serious, dedicated study of it, at schools dedicated to the teaching of it. I narrowly escaped a career in the Christian ministry. I am so sure that I know what I am talking about that I am willing to debate anyone who says other than I do about what the Scripture actually says and what it doesn't actually say. And here is what I say that it says: The gospel that is being taught in almost every evangelical and fundamentalist church in America is a false gospel, and it has condemned tens of millions of people to eternal damnation in the fires of Hell.
And what's worse, I am not the only one who knows this. Many of the pastors who preach this false gospel know it to be false. They went to academically rigorous seminaries. In those seminaries they studied God's word as I did. They were then carefully told what they could and couldn't say to their congregations if they wanted to hold a job in the ministry. In so doing, they were told certain passages to gloss over, to skip as much as possible, to obfuscate and misdirect whenever they came up. Instead, they were told which verses to emphasize, which explanations to give. Those who stray from their denominations' line on these matters find themselves unemployed; the false churches that fill this land don't want to hear the true gospel. In rare places around the country, some churches do cling to ministers who proudly call themselves Biblical literalists and who, nonetheless, preach the true gospel of Jesus Christ, not the false gospel of the majority of the fundamentalist churches. But when those leaders and those they save from the fires of Hell seek leadership posts in the major fundamentalist denominations, such as the Assemblies of God or (especially) the Southern Baptists, they find themselves ruthlessly and totally purged. Jimmy Swaggart knew this. He was preaching about it from time to time, before the prostitution scandal conveniently brought him down. He used to say on a regular basis that "Satan is very good at twisting the Church into a position of being directly opposed to God." And Satan, and his satanic ministers in almost every evangelical pulpit in America, will not easily let go of what those who would be God's people hear. Donald Miller has written several books about his search to find the true gospel inside so-called gospel churches; those so-called gospel churches condemn him and won't let him speak to their so-called faithful, and so his words go mostly unheard.
What is the false gospel? The false gospel is summed up in Campus Crusade for Christ's "Four Spiritual Laws," four laws that appear nowhere in the Bible itself: "Law 1: God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. Law 2: Man is sinful and separated from God, therefore he cannot know and experience God's love and plan for his life. Law 3: Jesus Christ is God's only provision for man's sin. Through Him you can know and experience God's love and plan for your life. Law 4: We must individually receive Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord; then we can know and experience God's love and plan for our lives." To this end, they provide this "suggested prayer" as the magical ritual that will absolve you of all sins and guarantee you an eternal life of Heaven, not Hell: "Lord Jesus, I need you. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord. Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life. Take control of the throne of my life. Make me the kind of person You want me to be." They and those like them preach that this is all that you need to do in order to guarantee that your name is written into the Book of Life, the list of those who will go to heaven on Judgement Day. Hundreds of millions of people all around the world believe this right now. Hundreds of millions more of them have believed it since it began to be preached in this way about 45 years ago. Many tens of millions have died believing that by performing this little ritual, they have saved their souls from damnation. A very large percentage of those who did so will find themselves burning in Hell for all eternity, and completely baffled as to why. Why? Because they were lied to.
You see, Judgement Day is described in three places in the Bible. In the false churches of the false gospel, they teach and preach extensively on one of them, 1st Corinthians chapter 15. They talk about Revelations chapter 20, but they don't quote it completely or accurately. But there's a third place where Judgement Day is described, and in rather more detail than in either of those places. What's more, it's described by the one who's going to do the judging. Wouldn't you think that that would be the interesting place to study Judgement Day? I'd certainly be more interested in the explicit, complete description of how the dead shall be judged that comes from the Judge Himself than one that came from any apostle, however inspired. And indeed, they can't completely make this description go away. But they have a false and fatuous explanation of it, one that encourages people to forget what they just read and go back to believing that lie about how all they had to do was pray, "God have mercy on me, a sinner." Here's what Jesus had to say, in His own words, in Matthew 25:31-46, when His followers asked him what the end was going to be like:
When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.And at the end of his most famous sermon, the Sermon on the Mount, this is what Jesus, the Judge of all the dead, said about the Four Spiritual Laws and similar false gospels, in Matthew 7:15-23:
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.Now, those who want to defend the false gospel will accuse me of preaching a false gospel myself, one of "works, not faith." They point out that Jesus said that He was the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by Jesus. Piffle. If you hear anyone who's a seminary graduate make this attack, then you know that they're not merely deceived, but actively lying to you. Why? This is first-year stuff, first semester stuff; easily and trivially disposed of by the Church Fathers almost two thousand years ago and taught to every halfway serious Bible student in his first month or two of classes. Yes, the scripture teaches that no amount of feeding the hungry and giving drink to the thirsty and clothing the naked and visiting prisoners will save you without Jesus' sacrifice. Yes, the Scripture teaches submission to Christ in faith. But it also clearly and unambiguously teaches that the only true way is neither pure faith nor pure works, but faith that works. If you think that your faith is in Jesus Christ but that faith allows you to callously neglect, feel contempt for, or actively despise the poor and unfortunate, then yours is not a gospel of Jesus Christ, but of the Devil himself. If you allow that urge to neglect to influence you, if you show that contempt, if you actively spite the poor and unfortunate because that false gospel taught you that it was OK to do so, then Jesus Himself says that you will burn for it.
(Next: How did so many seminaries and so many preachers and so many authors get converted to this false gospel? What deal did they make with Satan himself, and why? What did they think that they were doing? These aren't rhetorical questions. I've met one of the people who "signed" that deal and helped enforce it. He was quite proud of his achievement, and years later told many of us about the meeting where that decision was made. It is only recently that I came to understand just who the other side in that deal really was, as opposed to who the fundamentalists in that room thought they were dealing with. But this is already too long for one day. Tune in tomorrow.)

Comments
(This entry popped up on my friends of friends, page, incidentally, just so you don't feel strangely stalked).
I don't have anything to add, really... just wanted to express my appreciation for this entry. It's nice to see someone with a clue now and then. =)
American Christianity today puts forth a morality based not on doing good but on not doing evil; instead of saying "Be this!" it says "Don't you dare do this!" And it's not even consistent- God gives a lot more fashion restrictions than admonitions against homosexuality. I still think it'd be fun to go to a service given by a virulently antigay pastor and "stone him to death" with foam rocks for the crime of wearing a cotton poly blend.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
You surprised me! I've read a great many commentaries on fundamentalism and looked forward to reading yours, which was a great read by the way.
However, the previous ones I've read were written by those who have no belief in Christianity at all, and whatever spiritual beliefs they did have (if any) didn't include Hell.
Being a regular reader of your journal (and enjoying it quite a bit), I assumed your views on fundamentalism would be similar to those other commentaries. But unless I've missed something, it seems you do believe in some form of Christian gospel, including a fiery Hell.
Please enlighten me.
Jack
Now spill about "the deal," please. Please, please, please...
So why is the KJV the Official Word of God TM?
Why aren't more of these people learning Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew if "whole literalism" is their biggest concern?
One of the principal questions that gnawed at me a lot back in my Southern Baptist days was rooted in the very mechanism you describe here. Evangelical Protestants believe that the Bible is divinely inspired, and that the version that I can walk into Borders and buy is the true Word of God. That means that every editorial decision made by a mortal thorughout the past few millennia--whether trivial syntax or conjugation correction or the exclusion of entire books--has been the hand of God acting through man. All so that my $10.99 copy at Borders can be the perfectly revealed plan for mankind? It strikes me as incredibly *lazy* for Christians to believe that the holy text that they have easy access to, the one that's in every motel in America, the one that anyone can probably pick up for free from a church upon request, is the perfect Word of God. Doesn't it strike one as more likely that the "Bible Is Perfect" credo is a convenient way to ignore its convoluted history and the high likelihood that portions of it have been edited, translated, and made up whole cloth by persons with less than divine motivations? Doesn't it seem more likely that the "Bible Is Perfect" is a rationalization for not having to spend any scholarly effort on one's spiritual improvent beyond rote memorization? (Baptists *love* Scripture memorization, BTW.)
This is the same laziness and arrogance that afflicts advocates of intelligent design: Where we are now is the result of an endless series of tiny, divine modifications.
there is also the story about the rich man who asked Jesus what he needed to do to enter the Kingdom of Heaven- he had apparently done a lot of decent works, and obeyed the commandmants.
The answer was- give up all you have, and follow me. (I am paraphrasing from memory here.) Somehow, we end up with the interpretration that Jesus was just rebuking that particular rich man, but that other rich men can get into the kingdom of heaven very easily. At least, that was the party line I remember from the church I went to as a kid.
--Kynn, Christian who ain't "bible-believin'"
My father is currently going through seminary. He's about as far from a literalist as one can get, and he always tells me about the mistranslations and the possibility of missing information.
This post just sparks my interest even more into all that has gone on with this book that is supposedly the Word of God.
Mind if I friend you?
~Pip
- Satyr, a Pagan who loves the Christ but is not bound nor blinded by the dogma shat out in his name
Anyway, it's been around a lot longer than 45 years. Calvin was a strong proponent of it, and I think Augustine promoted this viewpoint that all you have to do is believe and pray. Oh, and probably be baptized.
I agree on almost all points.
My sumation of Christanity is this: The people who are "Christians" could not and would not want to live the life that Christ put forth in his teachings. Honestly I believe that Christ undid all the rules and laws that his father put forth. Making a new way for people to find redemption. This created two paths. One being the laws of the Old Testement, and one being the laws of the New Testiment. In fact one could take it further than that - What if every faith was simply a different path to spiritual enlightment? What if it is the people that have bred hatred into their faith - thus tainting the original ideal. I mean, that is what people do, isn't it? Twist ideals?
Either way, well done sir.
What raises my hackles more than anything is the 'read the letter, ignore the spirit' attitude that so many people have, that roommate included. If an unmarried man and woman are prohibited from 'sleeping together,' so to speak, wouldn't that mean that a fundamentalist Christian couple are bending a few of their own purported rules by sleeping together in the same bed, wearing minimal clothing, and doing 'anything but,' thus causing the present roommate great distress? Of course, in that case, I'm greatly biased -- like most people, I enjoy uninterrupted sleep.
I'm inclined to side with those who say governmental charity is much less desirable than private charity, although looking through this particular essay (I am unfamiliar with whether you've covered such things in another one) I see absolutely no mention of or reference to governmental charity, especially in light of the supposed American separation between church and state. However, the state of non-administrative public organizations (not just the school system) can be pretty horrible -- at one point when I was 14, I was placed in a children's shelter for three-and-a-half agonizing days. During that time, I was strongly discouraged from having any natural inquisition at all, and quite literally forced to spend 'academic hours' doing first or second grade level math worksheets that left me in tears from boredom and frustration. They mistook it for severe depression and tried to have me institutionalized.
I mention that incident because one or two of the staff, one blonde woman in particular, spent those days attempting to convert me to Christianity. Until that point, my experience with the religion had been (aside from what I was taught growing up as a Baha'i) limited mostly to the occasional visit to a friend's Sunday school and to friends' parents telling me that because I didn't share their religion, I was going to go to hell. However, what they were saying to me -- that I should pray, and develop a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and things would get better -- didn't ring true to me on any level. While they were attempting to evangelize, I was wondering why they didn't realize that faith in and of itself doesn't make everything better.
Sorry for the tangent.. it's just what came to mind.
I've always been of the opinion that we should take the Gospels (ie. those things reported to have been said by Jesus himself (not through intermediaries) as the basis for our faith (oh, ps, I am a practicing Christian, see not all of us follow the false gospel) and look long an hard at all the other stuff (like the letters of Paul) to try to discern how much is Jesus talking through him and how much is the writers own prejudices creeping in (Such as Revelations and the Number of the Beast (666? 616?)(which seems to indicate (according to many sources) that he's been and gone and was a person that the writer of Revelations had issues with himself (whether or not God did).
So this just supports my belief.
It's always good to read the views of those who have studies religion who haven't bought into the 'party line'.
Just to add fuel to the fire, "Given by the inspiration of God" (which translation are you using btw?) does not mean that every word was handed down directly from God. It means that God inspired all the writers of scripture who then wrote down what they then believed. Dante was inspired by the Beatrician Vision - this doesn't mean that Beatrice is directly responsible for Dante's work. (Pick any other artist/muse combination you like...)
(And did Saul of Tarsus believe himself to be actively writing scripture? He certainly and explicitely